Please wait a minute...
European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (1): 30-35    DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.01.4788
Original Research Previous articles | Next articles
Combined measurement of miRNA-183, HE4, and CA-125 increases diagnostic efficiency for ovarian cancer
J. Liang1, 4, †, X. Yang2, †, L. Liu3, †, L. Qiao4, P. Peng1, 4, J. Zhou1, 2, *()
1 Department of TCM Gynaecology, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, China
2 Cancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
3 Department of Gynaecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuzhou, China
4 Department of Gynaecology, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, China
Download:  PDF(1082KB)  ( 255 ) Full text   ( 4 )
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Objective: This study aimed to determine the role of miR-205, miR-182, and miR-183 expression in the serum of ovarian cancer patients in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: The expression of miR-205, miR-182, miR-183, CA-125, and HE4 was detected in the sera of 101 patients with ovarian cancer, 50 patients with benign ovarian diseases, and 50 healthy volunteers. The results were validated in 98 patients with ovarian cancer, 50 patients with benign ovarian diseases, and 53 healthy volunteers. The expression of miR-205, miR-182, miR-183, CA-125, and HE4 was subjected to ROC analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. Results: The sensitivity of miR-182 and CA-125 was highest (0.901% and 0.832, respectively), but the specificity was low (both 0.27) in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. HE4 had the highest specificity in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of HE4 were 0.842, 0.81, and 0.847, respectively. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that three variables were suitable for the diagnostic model: Y=Logit(P)=-5.457+5.365*miR183+0.019*HE4+0.004*CA125. Based on the diagnostic model, ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.97, 0.85, and 0.951, respectively. Statistical validation showed that the sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.941, 0.86, and 0.951, respectively. Conclusion: miR-183 has high specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Measurement of miR-183 combined with HE4 and CA-125 is of value for the early diagnosis and evaluation of ovarian cancer.
Key words:  miRNA-183      HE4      CA-125      Ovarian cancer     
Published:  15 February 2020     
*Corresponding Author(s):  JIANLONG ZHOU     E-mail:  303050757@qq.com
About author:  Contributed equally.

Cite this article: 

J. Liang, X. Yang, L. Liu, L. Qiao, P. Peng, J. Zhou. Combined measurement of miRNA-183, HE4, and CA-125 increases diagnostic efficiency for ovarian cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(1): 30-35.

URL: 

https://ejgo.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.01.4788     OR     https://ejgo.imrpress.com/EN/Y2020/V41/I1/30

[1] Buse Güler, Merve Çamlıbel, Samiye Mete. What Do Relatives of Turkish Women with Ovarian Cancer Share on Websites? : A Qualitative Research[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(5): 732-738.
[2] Yudi Mulyana Hidayat, Gatot Nyarumenteng Adhipurnawan Winarno, Maringan Diapari Lumban Tobing, Arieff Kustiandi, Kemala Isnainiasih Mantilidewi, Sofie Rifayani Krisnadi. The Role of Akt2 and CA-125 Serum Levels as Predictors for Successful Cytoreduction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(5): 739-744.
[3] Lingyun Zhai, Lixin Zeng, Hongru Jiang, Wei Li. Effects of a cyclooxygenase-1-selective inhibitor in combination with taxol or cisplatin on cyclin D1, apoptosis, and vascular endothelial growth factor in a xenograft model of ovarian cancer[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(5): 779-784.
[4] Qinglian Ma, Wenjie Yan, Jing Yang, Haiyan Wang, Weixiang Wang, Minghui Dong. Functional interpretation of ovarian cancer in correlation with ISGF3 expression pattern[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(5): 769-773.
[5] Silvia Ortega, José Angel Mínguez, José Manuel Aramendía, Marta Santisteban, Fernando Martinez-Regueira, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, Juan Luis Alcázar, Matías Jurado. The impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival in first recurrence of platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(4): 523-530.
[6] Jae Hong Sang, Soo-Ho Chung. Is it enough in ovarian cancer staging surgery to laparoscopic surgery? Comparison of surgical methods[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(4): 541-544.
[7] Sigit Purbadi, Gregorius Tanamas, Lisa Novianti. Advanced stage ovarian cancer survival in Jakarta[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(4): 587-590.
[8] Gen-Hai Zhu, Kang Wang, Lan Hong, Xin-Hui Fu, Fu-Jin Liu, Hai-Yan Huang. Safety and efficacy of fertility-sparing surgery for an orthotopic xenograft model of epithelial ovarian cancer in nude mice[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(4): 609-616.
[9] Xifang Lv, Amanguli, Ping Yang. The role of sodium hydrosulfide in the proliferation and apoptosis of exogenous SB203580 pre-treated human ovarian cancer cells[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(4): 622-628.
[10] F. Oyama, Y. Asano, H. Shimoda, K. Horie, J. Watanabe, Y. Yokoayama. Morphological analysis of peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer based on levels of carbonyl reductase 1 expression[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 352-360.
[11] C.J. Heesterbeek, A.M. Thijs, R.H.M. Hermans, D. Boll, G.-J. Creemers. Bevacizumab in combination with metronomic oral cyclophosphamide: an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 364-367.
[12] S.R Oh, J.-W. Park. Is the Risk of Malignancy Index a predictive tool for preoperative differentiation between borderline ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer?[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 368-374.
[13] T. Shoji, E. Takatori, M. Kagabu, M. Futagami, Y. Yokoyama, H. Tokunaga, N. Yaegashi, T. Ohta, T. Watanabe, T Sugiyama. Relationship between usefulness of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin therapy and the UGT1A1 genotype in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (TGCU 104 study)[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 380-385.
[14] Emine Karabuk, Burak Karadag, Ceyda Karadag, M. Faruk Kose, M. Murat Naki, E. Nilufer Guler. The outcomes of fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 391-395.
[15] Chenchen Zhu, Hanyuan Liu, Zhen Shen, Yanhu Xie, Tianjiao Zhang, Björn Nashan, Dabao Wu, Ying Zhou. Treatment and survival outcomes from epithelial ovarian cancer in women aged 65 years or older[J]. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 2020, 41(3): 415-421.
No Suggested Reading articles found!